What should the working table show?
Illustrative example. Replace the prompts with approved package information and the buyer's evaluation rules.
| Topic | Required content | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Requirement | Exact source and revision | Trace |
| Offered value | Supplier response and unit | Technical return |
| Evidence | Data sheet or drawing reference | Verification |
| Deviation | Exception and consequence | Clarification |
What does the source support?
FAR 13.106-2 gives a public-sector example of evaluating quotations against the factors established in the solicitation. The same traceability principle helps private buyers compare returns.
Sources: Acquisition.gov: FAR 13.106-2, Evaluation of quotations or offers
What should remain open?
Record unanswered supplier questions, qualifications and missing evidence in a clarification or evaluation log. The responsible engineering and commercial leads approve the final position.
Common questions
What else should the bid team know?
Does this guide select a supplier?
No. It structures evidence for the buyer's approved evaluation process.
Can a blank response be treated as included?
No. Mark it open and request clarification.
Who approves technical compliance?
The responsible project engineer reviews technical compliance and performs any engineering sign-off.
Primary sources
- FAR 13.106, Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations, and awardAcquisition.gov
- FAR 13.106-2, Evaluation of quotations or offersAcquisition.gov
- Request for QuotationsUS General Services Administration